==========Case Id=====================
1799
==========Plaintiff's Claim===========
1. The defendant B shall pay $28,000 and interest $2560. Payment of interest is calculated from the date of prosecution to the actual settlement date, based on the base rate of the People‘s Bank of China of the same period at the amount of $28,000. 2. The litigation costs in this case shall be paid by the defendant.
==========Fact Description============
After the hearing, the court held the facts as follows: On September 30, 2013 and August 25, 2014, the defendant B  borrowed $10,000 each time from the plaintiff A. The defendant issued a loan receipt to the plaintiff for each of the two loans. There was no written agreement on the interest and loan period. Later, the defendant did not return the loan, then it caused a dispute. The above facts are proved by two receipts of the loan provided by the plaintiff and the plaintiff's statement in the court.
==========Court's View================
The court concluded that: The private lending relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant is established and effective, and shall be protected according to law. The defendant should repay the loan after receiving it, but now he did not repay, it is obviously a breach of contract. Therefore, this court supports the claim of the plaintiff that the defendant should return the loan of $20,000 and the corresponding loss of interest. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant should pay interest, but did not provide evidence to prove that both of them clearly agreed on the interest, so the court does not support the plaintiff‘s claim for interest. The plaintiff withdrew some of the claims in the court hearing, and this court permitted it.
==========Judgment Annotation=========
0
